Unsorted FBI Documents

f

Attachment to Independent Case Review Report
For CDRU # 31 Case file # 70-74563 .

Material Examiner: Malone -{RQl

Remarks :

Although the case resulted in a trial, no transcript was
provided.

CRM-22496

J jvtjpV' '--w t - ?M0«** ! 1

INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEW REPORT

• - •*

- i «P

Independent Review conducted by: Steve Robertson

* ‘ * utcss. y+tyfa ? .. * 1 .u#^. ; '«pr* ■'•« • •

»•. ’ •*.» r *•-»»

dTS*..

;■-■ -r W*

' Area(s) of Expertise: Hair and Fiber

,-vw> - vd^Bq#a5!rft.ta»C W.HWCT&«*gW€

Review commenced at: 8:45 AM

(Time)/ f-1/14/00 (Date)

File#: 70-74563

Laboratory #(s): 50904015

Examiner(s) & Symbols

Reviewed

*•

Not Reviewed

Reviewed

Not Reviewed

RQ

xa

□

□

□

UF

□

XQ

□

□

o

□

□

a

Materials Reviewed

Trial testimony transcripts) of:

Testimony Date(s): Pages:

Laboratory Report(s):

. x . Laboratory Number: 50904015

Laboratory Number:

Laboratory Number:

Examiner Bench Notes of: RQ

Laboratory Number: 50904015

Date: Oct 28, 1985

Date:

Date:

Page 1 of 3

„ y r*DI\fl 0 * 1/1 A**

Initials:

Was any other material reviewed? Xo Yes * a No

If yes, please identify and/or describe tibe material: . Submitting agency letter of 8/29/85 •

Results of Review

File ft 70-74563

Item or Specimen # Reviewed: Q 1 , K 1

Review of Laboratory Report(s) and Bench Notes:

Note: Numbered comments are required below or on
additional pages for any “No” or “Unable to Determine” Responses

Did the examiner perform the appropriate tests in a scientifically acceptable manner, based on the
methods, protocols, and analytic techniques available at the time of the original examination(s)?

□ Yes □ No OX Unable to Determine

Are the examination results set forth in the laboratory report(s) supported and adequately documented in
the bench notes? oYes aXNo □ Unable to Determine

Review of Testimony:

Note: Numbered comments are required below or on
additional pages for any “No” or “Unable to Determine” Responses

□X Transcript not available.

3) Testimony consistent with the laboratory report(s)?

4) Testimony consistent with the bench notes?

5) Testimony within bounds of examinees expertise?

□ Yes

□ No

□ Unable to Determine

□ Yes

□ No

□ Unable to Determine

□ Yes

□ No

□ Unable to Determine

Page ’ 2
■Initials:

Sr-

, »H-v. . ■> I.V. <W~r n-W .fT — I

Cominents

(Set forth by above question #, if applicable.
Use “Additional Comments” Sheet, if needed)

File #: 70-74563

#1 . It cannot be determined from the documentation if the tests were performed in a scientifically acceptable

manner.

#2. The results are not adequately documented in the notes. The notes are not dated, are in pencil and not ink and

use

abbreviations that are difficult to interpret (such as "M-dk dist. It dist, It indist” and “cut-ssp” to describe

some of the characteristics of the hair).

Review completed at: 9:00 AM (Time), 11/14/ 2000

(Date)

Total time spent conducting review (to nearest 1/4 hour):

0.25 hour

Page

3 of 3

Initials: